Published in Nature Communications, 2022
Shows across a large network of Arctic sites that vegetation type strongly shapes the summer land surface energy budget.
Oehri J, Schaepman-Strub G, Kim J, Grysko R, Kropp H, Grünberg I, Zemlianskii V, Sonnentag O, Euskirchen E, Reji M, Muscari G, Blanken P, Dean J, Sarra A, Harding R, Sobota I, Kutzbach L, Plekhanova E, Riihelä A, Boike J, Miller N, Beringer J, López-Blanco E, Stoy P, Sullivan R, Kejna M, Parmentier F, Gamon J, Mastepanov M, Wille C, Jackowicz-Korczynski M, Karger D, Quinton W, Putkonen J, As D, Christensen T, Hakuba M, Stone R, Metzger S, Vandecrux B, Frost G, Wild M, Hansen B, Meloni D, Domine F, Beest M, Sachs T, Kalhori A, Rocha A, Williamson S, Morris S, Atchley A, Essery R, Runkle B, Holl D, Riihimaki L, Iwata H, Schuur E, Cox C, Grachev A, McFadden J, Fausto R, Göckede M, Ueyama M, Pirk N, Boer G, Bret-Harte M, Leppäranta M, Steffen K, Friborg T, Ohmura A, Edgar C, Olofsson J, Chambers S, "Vegetation type is an important predictor of the arctic summer land surface energy budget." Nature Communications, http://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-34049-3, 2022.